What is the “Theorema Egregium of the Universe”?

Egregium: because Nature is remarkable, beautiful. Through the testimony of our limited senses and guided by our evolving mathematical minds, a deep panorama unfolds.

How can we be certain that Nature is the way we think it is? What is Nature? Is there an ultimate answer?

The Gaussian curvature of a surface embedded in a three-dimensional space is an intrinsic geometrical property of the surface. The curvature could be measured by two-dimensional creatures living on it, without the need of a third degree of freedom. The “remarkable theorem” of Gauss inspires the naming of this weblog.

The Universe in the ultimate sense is “everything that exists”. Will we be able to understand it at all? One is tempted to feel that we are like those two-dimensional creatures, somewhat in principle able to learn about a maximum possible set of intrinsic “facts” [*] about our Universe. But could there be “extrinsic” facts as well, about which our own Nature is destined only to infer vaguely?

What is the “Theorema Egregium of the Universe”?

–[*] The reader may have noticed that my use of the word “fact” here carries the idea of a more abstract notion of a set of observables and, although being inspired by, does not refer to the specific differential geometry aspects of the Theorema Egregium of Gauss. It is intended as a step towards a much more abstract and wider ontological framework. This idea evidently must be worked out.

Ref: [Ber] — for an outline of the Theorema.

2 Responses to “What is the “Theorema Egregium of the Universe”?”

  1. serafino Says:

    There are several issues, in physics, especially in quantum physics, whose ‘Godelian’ nature is evident. Some references below.
    -Arthur Komar, Undecidability of Macroscopically Distinguishable States in Quantum Field Theory, Physical Review, 133, 1964), p. B542
    -Asher Peres, Measurement of Time by Quantum Clocks, merican Journal of Physics, 48, (1980), p. 552
    -Asher Peres, W.H. Zurek, Is Quantum Theory Universally
    Valid?, American Journal of Physics, 50, (1982), p. 807
    -David. Z. Albert, On Quantum-Mechanical Automata, Physics
    Letters, 98.A, (1983), p, 249
    -Asher Peres, On Quantum-Mechanical Automata, Physics
    Letters,101.A, (1984), p. 249
    -Asher Peres, Einstein, Godel, Bohr, Foundations of
    Physics,15, (1985), p. 201
    -Peter Mittelstaedt, The Interpretation of Quantum
    Mechanics and the Measurement Process, CAmbridge U.P., 1998.
    -Thomas Breuer, Quantenmechanick – Ein Fall fuer Goedel?,
    Spectrum,Heidelberg, 1996
    -Thomas Breuer, Classical Observables, Measurement and
    Quantum Mechanics,Ph.D. Thesis, Un. of Cambridge, 1994
    -Thomas Breuer, many papers at
    http://www.staff.fh-vorarlberg.ac.at/tb/tbpublisteengl.html
    -Karl Svozil, Randomness and Undecidability in Physics,
    Singapore, World Scientific, 1999.

  2. Dear serafino,

    This is quite an interesting collection of papers you have, and I thank you very much for posting your list here.

    Best regards,

    Christine

    NOTE ADDED: It seems the link to Thomas Breuer is broken. One that is working is this:

    http://www2.staff.fh-vorarlberg.ac.at/%7Etb/cms/?Publications

Leave a Reply